A new report explains how women, and especially women of color, are disproportionately hurt by Wall Street.
“Pinklining: How Wall Street’s Predatory Products Pillage Women’s Wealth, Opportunities & Futures,” details how sexism and racism are “increasingly exploited and exacerbated by Wall Street and the financial sector.”
The report, which was written by scholar Suparna Bhaskaran, shows how “Wall Street takes advantage of women’s precarious economic position and marginalization to push them deeper into debt,” in a practice Bhaskaran calls “pinklining.”
Structural sexism and structural racism make women and people of color more susceptible to pinklining, the report stresses.
It looks at three primary financial practices in which these inequalities are visible: subprime home mortgage lending, payday lending and higher education lending.
Subprime home mortgage lending increased from $35 billion in 1994 to an enormous $600 billion in 2006.
At the peak of subprime lending, in 2005, women were 30 to 46 percent more likely to receive subprime mortgage loans than men. Black women were a staggering 256 percent more likely to receive subprime loans than white men.
Wells Fargo was a particularly egregious example. It targeted black and Latina/o Americans with subprime loans, leading to a $175 million settlement with the Department of Justice in 2012.
The bank forced high-interest subprime mortgages on black households five times more than it did on their white equivalents. Wells Fargo employees also called black Americans “mud people,” and referred to subprime loans as “ghetto loans.”
This disproportionate targeting is clear in payday lending as well.
In the past two decades, the predatory payday lending industry grew by 10 times. In 1996, there were just around 2,000 payday loan stores; now, there are more than 20,000. By 2015, it had exploded into a $46 billion industry.
Nearly 60 percent of customers in these payday loan stores are women. Interest rates of more than 300 or even 400 percent often leave women and their families trapped in spirals of debt.
A study cited in the report found that payday lending centers in California were eight times more concentrated in primarily black and Latina/o neighborhoods than they were in primarily white neighborhoods.
Women and people of color are also disproportionately hurt by higher education lending.
From 1990 to 2012, student loan borrowing grew by 353 percent. Today, 40 million families have student loan debt.
Roughly 44 percent of men were able to pay off their student loan debt within three years, according to a 2009 study cited in the report. Just 33 percent of women were able to do the same. Among women of color, this figure is even lower: only 9 percent of black women and 3 percent of Latina women could pay off their student loans in 3 years.
For-profit colleges also disproportionately target women and people of color with predatory practices.
Although just 13 percent of undergraduate students in the U.S. are at for-profit colleges, nearly 40 percent of all student loan defaults are at for-profit colleges, which are usually more expensive than public institutions.
Despite this, enrollment in for-profit colleges increased by a staggering 565 percent from 1990 to 2013.
Women are disproportionately represented at these predatory institutions, making up nearly two-thirds, 65 percent, of students.
People are color are also disproportionately represented. Just 10 percent of white undergraduate students in the U.S. go to for-profit colleges, compared to 15 percent of Latina/o students and 28 percent of black students.
Getting worse, not better
“From the economic crisis triggered by the finance industry, to subprime mortgages, payday loans and student debt — again and again women and women of color are driven deeper and deeper into debt as a result of the practices of” Wall Street, the report notes.
In a statement, the author Suparna Bhaskaran stressed that Wall Street’s “pinklining ultimately deepens, widens and renews existing gendered and racialized economic inequality through the significant transfer of income and assets from low to moderate income women and women of color to the financial sector.”
These disparities have gotten even worse in recent years, as the 2008 financial crisis and the post-crash economy have taken a great toll on women.
The collapse led to shrinking public sector employment, and women bore the burden. In June 2009, women made up 57 percent of the public sector workforce. But from June 2009 to April 2011, 74 percent of public sector workers who lost their jobs were women.
In terms of post-recession job growth, women again got the short end of the stick. A net of 5.5 million jobs were created in the U.S. economy between June 2009 and July 2013. More than 3.5 million, nearly two-thirds, of those jobs went to men, while just around 2 million went to women. Many of those created were low-wage jobs, as well.
In the workplace, women of color have an even larger gender pay gap with men than white women. And yet, because of inequality, mass incarceration and employment discrimination, women of color are more likely to be single heads of households who need more resources for their families.
Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison, who co-chairs the Congressional Progressive Caucus, recommended the report for drawing attention to how the financial sector exploits the most vulnerable.
“The wealth gap between women of color and white families remains shockingly large,” he said in a statement. “This report highlights the harmful products and unfair policies that affects those with the fewest resources and calls us to take action.”
In addition to reviewing existing research, the report includes surveys with 771 women and 50 in-depth interviews, relaying their experiences with debt.
One woman featured in the report, Lorian Smith of East Orange, New Jersey, explains how she has struggled with banks that have been trying to foreclose on her home. “I have played by all the rules,” she said. “I got an education, I held down a career for 40 years, I bought a home where I raised my family.”
“Despite playing by the rules, I am now in a position that I am uncertain I will ever recover from,” Smith continued. “Debt has become a vicious cycle in my life and in the lives of many people I am in touch with.”
The report was jointly released by the community groups Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, New Jersey Communities United and ISAIAH in Minnesota.
The groups called on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to investigate how women, and especially women of color, are targeted by the financial industry.
“This is part of a broader national effort to hold banks and corporations accountable for the role they play in causing and profiting off of economic inequality and austerity policies that harm working class communities across the country, particularly communities of color,” the groups said in a statement.
They also expressed support for the new proposed regulations on predatory payday lending that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau released on June 2. Consumer advocates have warned that the pending rules, at present, do not do enough to rein in the exploitative industry. These community groups likewise urged the bureau to strengthen its proposed regulations.
Unions as one solution
The “pinklining” research was funded by the Women’s Equality Center, a non-partisan project that advocates for women’s rights.
In a recent article, the Women’s Equality Center also stressed how organizing into labor unions has helped women and people of color fight these forms of structural oppression.
“Women organized into unions gain the power to bargain for their working conditions, wages and benefits so they can achieve greater economic security for themselves and their families, moving them faster toward full equality with men,” the organization wrote.
It highlighted “labor’s specific role in advancing racial and gender justice for workers over the past few decades,” and noted that organizing into unions can help women close the wage gap with men.
The article cites a 2015 study, “The Union Advantage for Women,” which details how labor unions benefit women and people of color.
“Women of all races benefit from unions, but women of color, who are most disenfranchised in today’s economy benefit most,” the Women’s Equality Center emphasized, noting that women in unions are also more likely to have benefits like health insurance, paid leave and pensions.
Sister Simone Campbell, the executive director of the NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice and the leader of the activist group Nuns on the Bus, applauded the pinklining report for bringing attention to systemic inequality.
“Predatory financial practices prey on women and people of color, thus eroding the common good. These debt traps mask the crisis of wages in our society,” she said.
“This must be addressed for the sake of women workers, but also for the future of our nation. Our children are the victims in the long run. For this reason, we must mend the gaps. We must have an economy that puts people, not profit, at the center.”