With a 4-4 vote, an eight justice Supreme Court dealt a blow to President Obama’s signature immigration policy, blocking the implementation of executive orders meant to protect certain undocumented immigrants from deportation.
Thursday’s decision in United States v. Texas leaves in place the decision of then5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, effectively ending Obama’s initiative to circumvent Congressional inaction on comprehensive immigration reform.
The Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents plan, or DAPA, would have spared as many as 5 million undocumented immigrants from deportation. Led by Texas, a coalition of 26 states challenged the executive order on the grounds that the program exceeded the president’s statutory authority and imposed an undue burden on the states to implement.
House Speaker Paul Ryan was quickly to laud the decision:
BREAKING: President Obama’s use of executive action to grant amnesty to illegal immigrants is now null and void: pic.twitter.com/hsDrVSS93a
— Paul Ryan (@SpeakerRyan) June 23, 2016
While the same order cannot be revisited under a new president, the decision only fires up the issue of immigration ahead of the presidential election in November. Donald Trump has previously vowed to revoke Obama’s actions, while presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has said she would expand upon those actions.
“Let’s be clear, our community will never forget that it was Republican elected officials and politicians who stood in the way of the well-being of our families and have blocked any solutions to fix our broken immigration system,” Ben Monterroso, executive director of Mi Familia Vota, said in a statement following the decision. “The solution is in the hands of our community, and we will demonstrate the power of our vote come November.”
Of course, Obama’s nominee to replace deceased Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia has been vehemently prevented from any consideration by Senate Republicans.